If you do not already have Adobe Acrobat Reader Installed, you can download it free by clicking below.![]() |
|||||
| Advanced High-Strength Steel Guidelines | |||||
The Auto/Steel Advanced High-Strength Application Guidelines Project is compiling detailed case studies on the development and implementation of sheet metal stamping processes that employ AHSS steel grades. The intent of these case studies is to provide AHSS part designers with direction on how to design parts for maximum manufacturability, and to provide AHSS stamping process developers with direction on how to best design die processes for these grades. While there are currently on-going A/SP projects seeking to develop best practices for stamping a variety of AHSS components, these projects will not be complete for some time. This project draws from existing AHSS stamping experience to compile insights that can be used by automotive industry engineers today. |
|||||
|
Advanced High-Strength Steel Applications Guidelines
Description: The AHSS Applications Guidelines Group of the Auto/Steel Partnership (A/SP) has conducted several in-depth case studies of Advanced High-Strength Steel (AHSS) stampings for automotive structural components and has provided summaries of those studies and lessons learned in this manual. |
||||
|
01-01-AHSSAG-GIDP590-Reinf Ctr Plr Otr-Final. Date: January 2007 Description: 2.0 mm gauge HDGI DP590 center body pillar outer reinforcement made by draw forming on a B-class tri-axis transfer press with lower press air cushion. |
||||
|
01-02-AHSSAG-GIDP600-Reinf Ctr Bdy Plr-Final Date: January 2007 Description: 1.65 mm gauge HDGI DP600 center body pillar reinforcement made by stretch drawing on a 3000 ton, 6-station transfer press. |
||||
|
01-03-AHSSAG-GADP600-Reinf A-Plr Rr Upr-Final Date: January 2007 Description: 1.70 mm gauge HDGA DP600 rear upper A-pillar reinforcement made double attached by draw forming on a six station press line with nitrogen cushion in the draw die. Mating part to that in Case Study 02-02-AHSSAG-GADP600-Reinf A-Plr Frt Upr-Final below. |
||||
|
02-01-AHSSAG-GIDP800-PLT U-Body RR SI Rail TIE Date: January 2007 Description: 1.50 mm gauge HDGI DP800 rear side rail plate made double attached by draw forming on a double action lead draw C-class tri-axis six-station transfer press. |
||||
|
02-02-AHSSAG-GADP600-Reinf A-Plr Frt Upr-Final Date: January 2007 Description: 1.70 mm gauge HDGA DP600 front upper A-pillar reinforcement made double attached by draw forming on a six station press line with die-applied cushion pressure in the draw die. Mating part to that in Case Study 01-03-AHSSAG-GADP600-Reinf A-Plr Rr Upr-Final above. |
||||
|
03-01-AHSSAG-CRDP980-Reinf-Ctr Plr Otr Upr-Final Date: October 2007 Description: 1.50 mm CR DP980 center pillar outer upper reinforcement made double attached on a 5500 mm, 2000 ton high speed progressive die press. |
||||
|
03-03-AHSSAG-GADP600-Panel-Rear Rail-Final.pdf Date: October 2007 Description: 1.95 mm HDGA DP600 rear rail made by toggle draw with delay pad on a five station transfer press line with 2000 ton hydraulic press at station 1 and 1000 ton mechanical presses at stations 2 through 5. |
||||
|
04-01-AHSSAG-GIDP780-Reinf Mid-Rail Upr-Final.pdf Date: July 2008 Description: 1.20 mm HDGA DP780 mid rail reinforcement made in a 5500 mm long, 2000 ton high speed progressive die press. |
||||
|
2007 GDIS AHSS AG Presentation Date: January 2007 Description: Overview of the A/SP AHSS Applications Guidelines project. Contains material presented at GDIS 2007 in Livonia, Michigan. |
||||
| Body Systems Analysis | |||||
|
A Benchmark Study of Automotive Door Dimensional Quality - Executive Summary Date: January 2002 Committee: Body Systems Analysis Project Team |
||||
|
Event-Based Functional Build: An Integrated Approach to Body Development - Executive Report Date: Summer 1999 Committee: Body Systems Analysis Project Team |
||||
|
Event-Based Functional Build: An Integrated Approach to Body Development - Complete Version Date: Summer 1999 Committee: Body Systems Analysis Project Team |
||||
|
Automotive Sheet Steel Stamping Process Variation Date: Summer 1999 Committee: Body Systems Analysis Project Team |
||||
|
Automotive Body Measurement System Capability Date: Summer 1999 Committee: Body Systems Analysis Project Team |
||||
| Corrosion | |||||
|
A Guide to Corrosion Protection Date: December 1999 Committee: Light Truck Frame Project Team Description: An analysis of corrosion-related issues for passenger car and light truck underbody structural components |
||||
| Design Manual | |||||
|
Automotive Steel Design Manual Date: Revision 6.1 August 2002 Committee: American Iron and Steel Institute - Auto/Steel Partnership Description: Reference System |
||||
| Enhanced Forming Limit Diagrams | |||||
|
Technology Report Date: January 2003 Committee: Enhanced Forming Limit Diagram Project Team |
||||
|
Bead Wrap Videos Date: December 2002 Committee: Enhanced Forming Limit Diagram Project Team |
||||
|
Database Date: December 2002 Committee: Enhanced Forming Limit Diagram Project Team |
||||
|
Training Manual Date: December 2002 Committee: Enhanced Forming Limit Diagram Project Team |
||||
|
Research Report (complete) Date: October 2002 Committee: Enhanced Forming Limit Diagram Project Team Description: This 14.6 MB file contains the Research Report and all Appendices (recommended for high speed connections) |
||||
|
Research Report (body only) Date: October 2002 Committee: Enhanced Forming Limit Diagram Project Team Description: This 1.12 MB file contains the body of the report and does not include the Appendices |
||||
|
Research Report Appendices (except Appendix 3.3) Date: October 2002 Committee: Enhanced Forming Limit Diagram Project Team Description: This 1.86 MB file contains all appendices for the Research Report except Appendix 3.3 |
||||
|
Research Report Appendix 3.3 Date: October 2002 Committee: Enhanced Forming Limit Diagram Project Team Description: This file is 11.7 MB |
||||
| Future Generation Passenger Compartment | |||||
|
Future Generation Passenger Compartment Final Report (60MB) Date: June 2007 Committee: FGPC Committee Description: This engineering report presents the findings of a mass reduction study of a donor vehicle passenger compartment design while improving performance to address IIHS Side Impact Crash Event and the proposed FMVSS 2.5X Roof Strength requirements. The study concludes that with rigorous use of Advanced High-Strength Steel and efficient optimized design mass savings of 31.4 percent relative to 2004 baseline vehicles is possible. |
||||
|
Mass Compounding Final Report Date: June 2007 Committee: FGPC Committee Description: This report defines and quantifies the mass compounding effect during vehicle design with current mass influence coefficients developed from mass data of 35 contemporary vehicles. Mass compounding considers that a mass increase in a component has a ripple effect throughout the vehicle; other components need to be resized increasing vehicle mass even more. A more encouraging view of this behavior is considering a reduction in a component mass resulting in a greater mass saving. |
||||
|
Mass Compounding Calculator Date: June 2007 Committee: FGPC Committee Description: This Excel Spreadsheet implements the findings of the mass compounding study into a tool for estimating initial vehicle mass based on conventional vehicle baselines and calculating the additional mass savings possible from an initial mass reduction of a vehicle system(s) or component(s). |
||||
| High Strength Steel Awareness Bulletins | |||||
|
18) ULSAB: A Lightweight, Affordable, Structurally Superior Steel Auto Body. Date: Spring 1998 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
17) Ultra High Strength Steel Becoming a Key Material in Critical Safety Components Date: Fall 1997 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
16) Auto/Steel Partnership Industry Resource Groups Tackle Unique High Strength Steel Challenges. Date: Winter 1996 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
15) Chrysler Finds Rephosphorized Ultra Low Carbon Steel Improves Dent Resistance While Reducing Weight. Date: Summer 1996 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
14) High Strength Steel Provides the Support for Chrysler JA Car Underbody. Date: Spring 1996 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
13) Tailored Blanks Offer Weight and Cost Reductions with Performance Improvements. Date: Winter 1995 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
12) UltraLight Steel Auto Body Demonstrates Value of Steel in the Automobile's Future. Date: Fall 1995 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
11) High Strength Steel Usage Reaches New Heights on the Wings of Ford Windstar. Date: Spring 1995 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
10) The Right Time for the Right Material. Date: Fall 1994 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
9) Case in Point: A Comprehensive Look at Door Beams and General Motors Puts Its Stamp of Approval on New Side-Impact Beams Stamped of High Strength Steel. Date: Summer 1994 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
8) Case in Point: High Strength Steel Lights the way for New Chrysler Neon Date: Spring 1994 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
7) For Steelmakers, The Future is
LIGHT Date: Winter 1993 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
6) A Second Generation Built of High Strength Steel. Taurus/Sable Hood. Date: Spring 1993 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
5) Case in Point: The Development of The Roll-Formed High Strength Steel Bumper Support Beam Assembly For The 1992 General Motors N-Cars Date: Winter 1992 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
4) Case in Point: The Development of the 1993 LH Rear Rail - A Case Study by Chrysler Corporation Date: Fall 1992 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
3) High Strength Steel Highlights: The Use of High Strength Steels for Automotive Panels. A Discussion on Interviews with Peter Mould, Jay Montgomery, Pete Mooney, Tom Seel U.S. Steel Group, and Don Allen Phoenix Consulting, Inc. Date: Summer 1992 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
2) High Strength Steel Highlights: Case Study of the Ford Taurus Hood Date: Winter 1991 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
|
1) Auto/Steel Partnership Introduces New Source for Data on High Strength Steel Date: Fall 1991 Committee: High Strength Steel Task Force |
||||
| Hydroforming Materials and Lubricants | |||||
|
Final Summary Report Date: March 2004 Committee: Hydroforming Materials and Lubricants |
||||
| Joining Technologies | |||||
|
A/SP Starting Resistance Spot Weld Schedules for AHSS
Description: A/SP Starting Resistance Spot Weld Schedules for AHSS (hyperlink with the attached) The purpose of this Auto/Steel Partnership Joining Technologies project was to determine whether existing AC and DC weld schedules were suitable for advanced high-strength steels (AHSS) classified as IISI Group 3 and 4 materials. Verification of the weld schedules for Group 3 and 4 steels was accomplished by finite element modeling via SORPAS Version 7.0 software and limited welding of 2T and 3T stack-ups to validate the SORPAS results. |
||||
|
AWS/SAE D8.9M Recommended Practices for Test Methods for Evaluating the Resistance Spot Welding Behavior of Automotive Sheet Steel Materials Date: March 1, 2008 Committee: AHSS Joining Technologies |
||||
|
Mechanisms Of Electrode Wear During Resistance Spot Welding Hot-Dipped Galvanized Steel Date: June 1994 Committee: Electrode Wear Mechanisms Task Force |
||||
|
Weld Lobe Development and Assessment of Weldability of Common Automotive Fastners (Studs and Nuts) using Drawn Arc Welding Process
Description: A project to Assess Weldability and Develop Weld Lobes for Common Automotive Studs and Nuts Welded to Advanced High Strength Steels by Utilizing the Drawn Arc Welding Process |
||||
|
An Investigation of Resistance Welding Performance of AHSS Date: March 2007 Committee: Joining Technologies Team |
||||
|
Advanced High-Strength Steel (AHSS) Weld Performance Study for Autobody Structural Components Date: March 2007 Committee: Joining Technologies Team |
||||
|
Assessing Weldability of Projection Welding Fasteners to AHSS using Finite Element Analysis Date: March 2007 Committee: Joining Technologies Team |
||||
|
Temperature Effect on Impact Performance of AHSS Welds Date: March 2007 Committee: Joining Technologies Team |
||||
|
Operating Procedures for Conducting the A/SP DOE of Coated Steels Date: July 30, 1999 Committee: Welding Task Force |
||||
|
High Strength Steel Weldability DOE Test Method Correlation Date: December 2, 1998 Committee: Welding Task Force Description: Test method correlation study to compare the A/SP weld quality endurance test method top current automotive resistance welding test procedures. |
||||
|
Resistance Spot Welding Electrode Wear On Galvannealed Steels Date: September 1997 Committee: Electrode Wear Mechanisms Task Force |
||||
|
Finite Element Modelling Of Electrode Wear Mechanisms Date: April 10, 1995 Committee: Electrode Wear Mechanisms Task Force |
||||
| Lightweight Chassis Structures | |||||
|
HYPERVIEWER - Download Required for presentation | ||||
|
Light Truck Frame Joint Stiffness Study - Phase 3 Date: January 2005 Committee: Light Truck Frame Project Team |
||||
|
Joint Stiffness Toolbox: An Excel Spreadsheet for Predicting Joint Stiffness Date: October 2005 Committee: Light Truck Frame Project Team |
||||
|
Light Truck Frame Joint Stiffness Study - Phase 2 Date: Summer 2004 Committee: Light Truck Frame Project Team |
||||
|
Lightweight SUV Frame Design Development Date: July 2003 Committee: Light SUV Frame Project Team |
||||
|
Light Truck Frame Joint Stiffness Study - Phase 1 Date: Summer 2001 Committee: Light Truck Frame Project Team |
||||
| Lightweight Closures | |||||
|
Lightweight Closures 2004 Full Report Date: 2004 |
||||
|
Lightweight Closures 2002 Full Report Date: 2002 |
||||
|
Lightweight Closures 2001 Full Report Date: 2001 |
||||
| Lightweight Front End Structures | |||||
|
Milestone 8 Animation Date: October 2005 |
||||
|
Milestone 7 Animation Date: October 2005 |
||||
|
Milestone 10 Animation Date: October 2005 |
||||
|
Milestone 16 Animation Date: October 2005 |
||||
|
Milestone 22 Animation Date: October 2005 |
||||
|
Proteus Application Date: October 2005 |
||||
|
Lightweight Front End Structures - Final Report (111MB) Date: October 2005 |
||||
|
Milestone 1 Animation Date: October 2005 |
||||
|
Milestone 5 Animation Date: October 2005 |
||||
|
Milestone 6 Animation Date: October 2005 |
||||
| Material Uniformity | |||||
|
Material Uniformity of High Strength Sheet Steels Vol. 2 Date: November 1, 1998 Committee: Materials Uniformity Project Team |
||||
|
A Report On Uniformity Of Coating Weights
On Automotive Sheet Steels
Volume 2 Date: August, 1995 Committee: Materials Uniformity Project Team |
||||
|
A Report on Uniformity Of Surface Texture Of Steel
Sheet For
Automotive Applications Date: January 1993 Committee: Materials Uniformity Project Team |
||||
|
Uniformity of Automotive Sheet Steel Properties - Volume 2 Date: March 1991 Committee: Task Force on Uniformity of Materials Properties |
||||
| NAAMS Global Standard Components | |||||
|
NAAMS Global Standard Components - Assembly | ||||
|
NAAMS Global Standard Components - Stamping | ||||
| Sheet Steel Fatigue | |||||
|
A/SP Spot Weld Fatigue Knowledge Base Date: February 2006 Committee: Sheet Steel Fatigue Project |
||||
|
Sheet Steel Fatigue Data Date: April 2004 Committee: Sheet Steel Fatigue Project |
||||
| Stamping And Formability | |||||
|
Cross Cowl Executive Summary Date: June 2007 Committee: AHSS Stamping Committee Description: Summary of the springback phenomena associated with a cross cowl structural member made from dual phase steel in stamping tryouts using the A/SP master die shoe. |
||||
|
Cross Cowl Member Stamping Trials - Final Report Date: June 2007 Committee: AHSS Stamping Committee Description: A technical report of the springback phenomena associated with a cross cowl structural member made from dual phase steel in stamping tryouts using the A/SP master die shoe. |
||||
|
High Strength Steel Stamping Design Manual Date: December 2000 Description: Collaborative product-process development guidelines for high strength steel stampings |
||||
|
Automotive Design Guidelines for Steel Stampings: Design for Manufacturability Date: January, 1993 Committee: Design Guidelines Subcommittee |
||||
|
Managing The Stamping Process Date: October 1991 Committee: Stamping Task Force |
||||
| Tailor Welded Blanks | |||||
|
Tailor Welded Blank Applications And Manufacturing - A State of The Art Survey Date: June 2001 Committee: Tailor Welded Blank Project Team |
||||
|
The Identification and Analysis of Intangible Benefits
of Tailor Welded Blank Applications Date: Summer 1999 Committee: Tailor Welded Blank Project Team |
||||
|
Tailor Welded Blank Acceptance Guidelines Date: July 1995 Committee: Tailor Welded Blank Project Team |
||||
|
Tailor Welded Blank Checklists Date: July 1995 Committee: Tailor Welded Blank Project Team |
||||
|
Tailor Welded Blank Design and Manufacturing Manual Date: July 1995 Committee: Tailor Welded Blank Project Team Description: Although tailor welded blanks were first developed as a way of using collectible offal, the biggest potential today is in the use of tailor welded blanks made of sheet steels with different thicknesses, coatings and properties. Currently, tailor welded blanks are used for bodyside frames, door inner panels, motor compartment rails, center pillar inner panels and wheelhouse/shock tower panels. |
||||
| Tribology | |||||
|
A/SP Procedures For Testing Characteristics of Automotive Sheet Steel Lubricants
Description: The purpose of this document is to specify the acceptable performance requirements for an automotive sheet metal lubricant. Lubricants include mill oils, prelubes, draw compounds, blankwashes, and dry films. The term "lubricant" used in these procedures is used to describe any product added to the sheet metal that serve the primary purposes of rust prevention, friction reduction, or sheet steel cleanliness. |
||||